State Nomination for Early Childhood Teachers: Which States Are Open and Why NT Stands Out 8 min read

State Nomination for Early Childhood Teachers: Which States Are Open and Why NT Stands Out

Early childhood teachers have better state nomination options than many professions. This guide maps the active states, explains the NT and regional advantage, and sets realistic expectations.

K
Kevin Cai
2 July 2026 8 min read

Which states are nominating early childhood teachers for 190 or 491 in 2026?

As of mid-2026, SA, TAS, WA, NT, and QLD all have active or periodically open nomination pathways for Early Childhood (Pre-primary School) Teachers (ANZSCO 241111) under subclass 190 or 491.

Early childhood teachers occupy a genuinely privileged position in Australia's skilled migration landscape: they appear on the MLTSSL, meaning they are eligible for both the federal 189 and state-nominated 190 and 491 visas. In practice, however, the 189 pool has become extremely competitive, with observed minimum invite scores sitting at around 90 points. That makes state nomination the realistic primary pathway for most ECT applicants in 2026.

The table below summarises what each active state is offering and the key conditions attached, based on the facts stub data current to June 2026. Always verify directly with each state migration office before lodging a registration of interest, as program windows open and close without notice.

State / Territory Visa Type Nomination Status (2026) Key Condition
Northern Territory (NT) 190 / 491 Active — relatively open Darwin region; long-term severe shortage; broader criteria
South Australia (SA) 190 Active — stable demand Adelaide metropolitan and surrounds; conditions apply (see below)
Tasmania (TAS) 190 / 491 Active — conditions apply Residency and employment conditions; regional focus
Western Australia (WA) 190 Active Skills in demand; check current program guidelines
Queensland (QLD) 190 / 491 Active — regional focus Regional ECE centres; graduate pathway available
"昆州幼教毕业的同学们,如果毕业后已经在昆州工作做ECT,EOI分数不太低(70-85)建议留在昆州等州担保,不要轻易去其他州。这个财年幼教获邀都很顺利!"
— One of our early childhood teacher applicants, 2025

Queensland is particularly notable for its graduate pathway: applicants who graduated in Queensland from July 2021 onwards and are currently employed as an ECT in the state have reported successful nominations even with base EOI scores in the 70–85 range. The state places significant weight on active local employment over raw points score alone.

Note: Victoria and New South Wales do not currently appear on the active list for ECT nominations. Applicants based in Melbourne or Sydney who cannot relocate should explore the 482 employer-sponsorship route or focus on building points for the federal 189. VJ Consulting and Education can map out the right pathway for your individual profile.
📖 How 189, 190 and 491 visas compare — full breakdown →

Why does the Northern Territory offer the best nomination conditions for ECE teachers?

The NT offers the most accessible nomination conditions for early childhood teachers because Darwin and surrounding communities face a long-term, severe shortage of qualified ECTs that other states simply do not match.

Australia's early childhood teacher shortage is not evenly distributed. Major cities like Sydney and Melbourne have crowded pools of qualified graduates competing for a fixed number of positions. The Northern Territory sits at the opposite extreme: persistent under-supply of qualified ECTs, significant government-funded expansion of early learning services, and a comparatively small applicant pool competing for NT nomination.

From a migration mechanics perspective, this translates into several concrete advantages for ECT applicants targeting NT:

Factor NT Advantage Typical Metro State Comparison
Shortage severity Long-term, classified severe Moderate to low in major cities
Nomination criteria Relatively broader / more accessible Often stricter employment or residency requirements
Competition for nomination spots Lower applicant volume Higher competition, especially in SA and WA
DAMA availability Yes — NT DAMA has specific ECT provisions Limited or no DAMA for ECT
English threshold under DAMA Can be reduced to IELTS 7.0 overall Standard 7.5 per band applies

The NT's Designated Area Migration Agreement (DAMA) is a particularly powerful lever for early childhood teachers. The standard English requirement for ECTs assessed by ACECQA is IELTS 7.5 in each band — one of the highest thresholds of any skilled occupation. The NT DAMA can, in certain circumstances, reduce the required level, which opens a path for applicants who are strong in every other dimension but are held back by the English score.

"幼教是澳洲移民里'政策最友好但工资最低'的职业之一,适合愿意地区生活的申请人。"
— One of our early childhood teacher applicants, 2025

That quote captures the honest trade-off. Darwin is not Sydney. The lifestyle is tropical, the community is tight-knit, and the salary range for ECTs across Australia sits between approximately AUD 55,000 and 80,000 — with regional premium being modest. However, housing costs in Darwin are substantially lower than in southern capitals, and the practical reality of securing nomination is meaningfully easier. For applicants who are flexible about location, the NT is the single clearest arbitrage opportunity in ECT migration right now.

VJ Consulting and Education regularly advises ECT applicants on whether the NT pathway — via 190, 491, or DAMA — fits their specific profile. The answer depends on English scores, assessment status, and willingness to commit to regional residence.

Note: NT nomination under subclass 190 requires a commitment to live and work in the NT for at least two years after the visa is granted. This is a legal obligation, not a suggestion. Under 491, the regional residence requirement extends to three years.

What points score do early childhood teachers need for state nomination?

Most ECT applicants securing state nomination in 2026 have a base EOI score of 65–75 points, which becomes 70–80 after the 5-point nomination bonus is added — well below the 90-point threshold observed in the federal 189 pool.

This is the core reason state nomination is so valuable for early childhood teachers. The 189 federal pathway has become functionally inaccessible for most applicants: the minimum observed invite score sits at 90 points, and with 231 applicants already sitting at 90 points in the pool as of mid-2025, competition at that threshold is intense. Reaching 90 points requires a near-perfect combination of age, English scores, Australian qualifications, and work experience — a profile that very few ECT applicants hold simultaneously.

By contrast, state nomination through a 190 or 491 visa adds 5 or 10 points respectively to your base score and operates on state-level allocation — meaning you are competing within a much smaller pool of ECT-specific nominees, not against the entire national skilled migration cohort.

Pathway Points Bonus Typical Base Score to Be Competitive Total After Bonus 189 Comparison
Subclass 190 (state nomination) +5 65–75 70–80 189 min observed: 90
Subclass 491 (regional nomination) +15 60–65 75–80 189 min observed: 90

The practical bottleneck for ECT applicants is almost never the points score itself — it is the English requirement. ACECQA's assessment and the skilled visa both require IELTS 7.5 in each individual band (or equivalent in PTE at 65 per communicative skill, or OET at Grade B). This is higher than the requirement for registered nurses and many other health occupations, and it is the single most common reason ECT applicants fail to progress.

"最后的解法肯定是英文考试分数全部拉满的情况下➕工作。工作是189 190最后的解法。"
— One of our early childhood teacher applicants, 2025

That observation from an applicant in the pool is accurate. Once you have cleared the English hurdle, a base score in the 65–75 range — achievable through a combination of age points, Australian study, and even a short period of skilled work experience — is sufficient to be competitive for state nomination in the active states. The QLD applicant community has demonstrated this clearly, with members successfully nominated at 80+5 through the graduate pathway.

Note: Points are calculated based on your situation at the time of invitation, not at the time of EOI lodgement. If your circumstances change (new work experience, age bracket shift, English retest), update your EOI promptly. VJCE advisers regularly review client EOIs to ensure no points are being left unclaimed.
📖 How skilled migration points are calculated in Australia →

Is the 491 regional visa realistic for early childhood teachers?

Yes — the subclass 491 is a genuinely realistic and often overlooked pathway for early childhood teachers, particularly through regional state nomination or the NT and QLD DAMA frameworks.

The 491 is a provisional regional visa that grants five years of work and study rights in designated regional areas, with a pathway to permanent residence through the subclass 191 after meeting residence and income requirements. For early childhood teachers, it aligns extremely well with actual labour market conditions: the profession's genuine vacancies are concentrated in regional and remote areas, not in capital cities.

There are two routes to a 491 for ECT applicants:

Route 1: State or Territory Nomination (491)

States including NT, TAS, and QLD can nominate ECTs for 491. The 491 adds 15 points to your base EOI score (compared to 5 points for 190), which means applicants with a base score as low as 60 points can become competitive once nomination is secured. The trade-off is that you must live and work in a designated regional area for three years before applying for the 191 permanent visa.

Route 2: Family Sponsorship (491)

If you have an eligible family member living in a designated regional area of Australia, they may be able to sponsor you for a 491 independently of any state nomination. This route is less commonly used by ECT applicants but worth noting for those with regional family connections.

491 Feature Detail
Points bonus +15 (vs +5 for 190)
Visa duration 5 years provisional
PR pathway Subclass 191 after 3 years regional residence + income threshold
DAMA compatibility Yes — NT DAMA and parts of QLD DAMA include ECT provisions
Realistic for ECT? Yes — regional ECE centres have genuine vacancies

The DAMA dimension deserves particular emphasis. In the NT and parts of Queensland, DAMA arrangements allow employers to sponsor ECTs under conditions that differ from the standard skilled migration program — including, in certain cases, a reduced English threshold of IELTS 7.0 overall (compared to the standard 7.5 per band). For applicants who have strong qualifications and experience but cannot clear the per-band English requirement, the DAMA route combined with a 491 outcome represents a legitimate alternative.

"地区幼教中心严重缺人,491+DAMA双轨对幼教特别友好。"
— One of our early childhood teacher applicants, 2025

The honest limitation of the 491 is the three-year regional commitment before you can apply for permanent residence through 191. For applicants with children in school, partners with metropolitan careers, or strong ties to a capital city, this is a real constraint. VJ Consulting and Education assesses these lifestyle factors alongside migration eligibility — because a visa that requires you to live somewhere you won't actually live is not a real solution.

*This article is intended as general guidance only and does not constitute legal or migration advice. Visa requirements, fees, and processing times change regularly — always verify details on the relevant authority's official website before making decisions.*
K
Kevin Cai
Principal Migration Adviser | Registered Migration Agent (MARN 1791066)

Kevin Cai is a Registered Migration Agent (MARN 1791066) with extensive experience in Australian migration law and visa services. He holds a Double Degree from the University of Melbourne and combines strong academic credentials with practical migration expertise.

Kevin specialises in Skilled Migration, Employer Sponsored Visas (482, 186), Partner Visas, Parent Visas, Business Migration and complex migration matters. His comprehensive understanding of Australian migration legislation and policy enables him to provide strategic, practical and outcome-focused advice to clients from diverse backgrounds.

Ready to start your journey?

Every migration case is unique. Book a private strategy session with our MARA-registered agents to get advice tailored to your situation.

Schedule Consultation

Our Accreditations

Migration Agents Migration Agents
Victoria Victoria
Migration Institute Migration Institute
VJ Consulting is an independent migration firm which is not associated in any way with the Australian Department of Home Affairs (DHA). Information on this website does not constitute personal migration advice. For an appraisal of your unique personal situation, please book a consultation and talk to one of our Registered Migration Agents, who are all bound by the MARA Code of Conduct.
© 2026 VJ Consulting. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy